Corrections and takedown

A direct route to review.

Report an inaccurate statement, rights concern, source issue, or future product observation for documented review.

Last updated September 22, 2026

What to include

  • the exact page URL or future product and market identifier;
  • a concise description of the issue;
  • the correction or action requested;
  • supporting public authority, source URL, or evidence reference; and
  • your relationship to the affected right, organization, or data.

How to submit

Email c137n31@gmail.com with the subject “WishWeeder correction or takedown.” Do not send account credentials, private API keys, or unnecessary personal information.

Review process

  1. The request is acknowledged and assigned a review record.
  2. Identity, source, market, rights, and current publication state are checked.
  3. Materially uncertain public information is paused or labeled while reviewed.
  4. The outcome and any corrective publication or removal are recorded.

Response timing depends on severity, evidence, and verification needs. Security threats, exposed personal data, and credible rights-holder requests receive priority.

Good-faith requests

This process is intended for specific, good-faith concerns. It does not guarantee that accurate factual information, lawful references, criticism, or independently developed methodology will be removed on demand.